Crime + investigation
Case File: Oscar Pistorius
The death of Reeva Steenkamp turned the Olympian hero into a convicted murderer.
On February 14, 2013, South African Paralympic champion Oscar Pistorius shot and killed his girlfriend, model and law graduate Reeva Steenkamp, through a locked bathroom door at his home in Pretoria. Pistorius claimed he mistook her for an intruder, but prosecutors argued that he deliberately killed her following an argument. The shooting shocked South Africa and brought a dramatic end to the celebrated athlete's career. After years of trials and appeals, Pistorius was convicted of murder and sentenced to 13 years and five months in prison. He was released on parole in January 2024.
Author's socials
Quick facts
Background
Pistorius was born in Johannesburg, South Africa, in 1986, without fibulas, the long bones in the lower legs. Both legs were amputated below the knee when he was 11 months old. Raised in Pretoria, he participated in several sports before taking up competitive running as a teenager following a rugby injury.
Using carbon-fiber prosthetic blades, Pistorius became one of the world's most successful Paralympic athletes. Nicknamed the "Blade Runner," he won six gold medals across three Paralympic Games. After challenging restrictions on competing against able-bodied runners, he made history at the 2012 London Olympics as the first double-amputee runner to compete in track events. His achievements brought international fame and lucrative sponsorship deals.
Reeva Steenkamp was born in Cape Town in 1983. She earned a law degree from Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University before moving to Johannesburg to pursue modeling. She appeared in advertising campaigns, was featured in FHM Magazine and participated in the reality television series Tropika Island of Treasure. Beyond her modeling career, Steenkamp had an interest in using her public profile to advocate for women's rights and spoke out against domestic violence.
Pistorius and Steenkamp began dating in late 2012 after meeting through mutual acquaintances. Their relationship quickly attracted media attention, bringing together one of South Africa's most celebrated athletes and a rising model and television personality. By February 2013, they had been together for approximately three months.
Key Events
In the early hours of February 14, 2013, Pistorius fired four shots through the locked toilet cubicle door inside the bathroom of his home in Pretoria's Silver Woods Country Estate. Three bullets struck Steenkamp, causing fatal injuries to her head, arm and hip.
Pistorius later testified that he had awakened during the night and heard a noise coming from the bathroom. Believing an intruder had entered the house, he said he retrieved a 9 mm pistol from beneath his bed and approached the bathroom without putting on his prosthetic legs. He claimed he shouted warnings before firing through the door, fearing that someone inside posed a threat to him and Steenkamp.
According to Pistorius, he believed Steenkamp was still in the bedroom. After firing, he returned to the bed and realized she was missing. He then put on his prosthetic legs, retrieved a cricket bat and broke open the locked toilet cubicle door, finding Steenkamp seriously wounded inside.
Pistorius carried Steenkamp downstairs and called for help. Neighbors and residential security personnel responded, including a doctor who lived nearby and attempted to assist her. Despite efforts to revive her, Steenkamp died at the scene. Police recovered Pistorius' pistol, the damaged bathroom door and other evidence from the house.
Pistorius was arrested that morning and charged with murder. The killing immediately attracted international attention, particularly because it occurred on Valentine's Day and involved two prominent South African figures. Steenkamp had also been scheduled to deliver a motivational speech to Johannesburg schoolchildren that day, drawing on her own experiences to discuss self-worth, empowerment and abusive relationships.
At a bail hearing later that month, Pistorius denied intentionally killing Steenkamp, insisting that the shooting had been a tragic mistake. He was granted bail on February 22, 2013, while awaiting trial.
Investigation
Investigators examined the physical evidence, witness accounts and the couple's communications to determine what had happened in the hours before Steenkamp's death.
Forensic experts examined the bullet trajectories, cartridge casings, bathroom door and Steenkamp's injuries to reconstruct the shooting. Although prosecutors initially questioned whether Pistorius had been wearing his prosthetic legs, ballistics evidence supported his account that he had fired while standing on his stumps. Other aspects of the reconstruction, including the sequence of sounds heard by neighbors, remained disputed.
Prosecutors argued that the couple had been involved in an argument and that Pistorius deliberately fired at Steenkamp as she sheltered inside the toilet cubicle. Several neighbors reported hearing screams and gunshots, with some claiming they had heard a woman screaming. The defense challenged those accounts, arguing that Pistorius himself had been screaming in a high-pitched voice. Witnesses also differed about the sequence of sounds they heard, complicating efforts to establish a precise timeline.
Investigators recovered text messages suggesting tensions in the relationship. In one exchange, Steenkamp told Pistorius she was sometimes frightened by his temper and jealous behavior. Other messages showed affection between the couple, however, and prosecutors could not establish that an argument had occurred immediately before the shooting.
Pistorius' handling of firearms also came under scrutiny. Witnesses described previous incidents involving guns, including an occasion when a pistol discharged beneath a table at a Johannesburg restaurant. Prosecutors argued that these incidents demonstrated reckless behavior, although the defense maintained they were unrelated to Steenkamp's death.
Legal Proceedings
Pistorius' trial began in March 2014 in the High Court in Pretoria, presided over by Judge Thokozile Masipa. During the televised proceedings, Pistorius repeatedly broke down in tears, apologized to Steenkamp's family and insisted he never intended to hurt her. Prosecutors challenged inconsistencies in his account, while the defense emphasized his vulnerability without prosthetic legs and fear of home invasions. A psychiatric evaluation found that he was criminally responsible for his actions.
In September 2014, Masipa acquitted Pistorius of murder but convicted him of culpable homicide, South Africa's equivalent of manslaughter. She found that prosecutors did not establish the intent required for murder, although Pistorius acted negligently by firing through the door. He was also convicted of discharging a firearm in a public place in connection with the restaurant incident. He received a five-year prison sentence that October and was transferred to house arrest after approximately one year.
Prosecutors appealed, arguing that Masipa had incorrectly applied dolus eventualis, a legal principle under which someone can be convicted of murder if they foresee that their actions might cause death and consciously disregard that risk. In December 2015, South Africa's Supreme Court of Appeal overturned the culpable homicide conviction and found Pistorius guilty of murder. The judges ruled that he had foreseen the possibility of killing whoever was behind the door and rejected his claim that he believed deadly force was necessary to defend himself.
In July 2016, Pistorius received a six-year sentence for murder, but prosecutors again appealed, arguing that the punishment was too lenient. In November 2017, the Supreme Court of Appeal increased his sentence to 13 years and five months, applying the standard 15-year minimum with credit for time already served in prison and under correctional supervision. His subsequent efforts to challenge the ruling were unsuccessful.
Aftermath
Pistorius' conviction ended his professional running career. Major sponsors, including Nike and Oakley, severed ties with him, and his sporting achievements became overshadowed by the murder case.
For Steenkamp's family, the lengthy proceedings meant years of public scrutiny and repeated courtroom appearances. Her parents, Barry and June Steenkamp, challenged Pistorius' account and maintained that their daughter had been deliberately killed. They also expressed frustration with the original verdict and sentence.
In June 2022, Pistorius met with Barry as part of South Africa's victim-offender dialogue program, a restorative justice process required before parole consideration. Barry later maintained that he still did not believe Pistorius' account of the shooting.
Pistorius was initially denied parole in March 2023 after correctional officials determined that he had not served the required portion of his sentence. Authorities subsequently acknowledged that his eligibility had been incorrectly calculated. Following another hearing, a parole board approved his release in November 2023.
On January 5, 2024, Pistorius was released from prison. His parole conditions included restrictions on travel, alcohol consumption and media interviews, along with rehabilitation programs addressing anger management and gender-based violence. His sentence is scheduled to expire on December 5, 2029.
Pistorius initially avoided public appearances. In June 2025, however, he participated in an Ironman 70.3 triathlon in Durban, South Africa, marking a limited return to competitive sport more than a decade after Steenkamp's death.
Public Impact
Steenkamp's murder became one of the world's most closely followed criminal cases, drawing international attention to domestic violence, gun ownership and celebrity. The televised trial allowed audiences around the world to follow the testimony and legal arguments, raising questions about how fame might shape public perceptions of defendants.
In South Africa, the killing intensified debate about violence against women and the country's high rates of intimate-partner homicide. Steenkamp supported campaigns against sexual violence, and activists argued that the intense focus on Pistorius risked overshadowing her life and the circumstances of her death.
The case has continued to attract public attention, including through the 2020 documentary series The Life and Trials of Oscar Pistorius. More than a decade after the shooting, it remains widely discussed, raising questions about celebrity, justice and accountability.
SOURCES
Oscar Pistorius
The making and unmaking of Oscar Pistorius
Track star, convicted killer, now parolee. A timeline of Oscar Pistorius’s life
Oscar Pistorius Timeline: From 'Blade Runner' hero to convicted murderer
Oscar Pistorius trial: the full story, day by day
Oscar Pistorius: a runaway interpreter, then the trial of the century begins
Oscar Pistorius: Valentine’s Day Of Despair
Correctional Services on Oscar Pistorius being placed on parole
Director of Public Prosecutions, Gauteng v Pistorius (950 of 2016) [2017] ZASCA 158 (24 November 2017)
Director of Public Prosecutions, Gauteng v Pistorius (96/2015) [2015] ZASCA 204; [2016] 1 All SA 346 (SCA); 2016 (2) SA 317 (SCA); 2016 (1) SACR 431 (SCA) (3 December 2015)
Related Features:
Dru Sjodin’s 2003 Murder Led to the First National Sex Offender Registry
Sex offender Alfonso Rodriguez Jr. murdered the college student in November 2003.
New Allegations Could Reshape the Bryan Pata Murder Retrial
The case against Rashaun Jones was declared a mistrial.
An Anesthesiologist Accused of Assault Fled and Evaded Capture for 21 Years
Ronald L. Fischer ran away while on trial for sexual assault in 2005.
Why a Mother Convicted of Killing Her 2 Sons Is Getting a New Trial
Marlon and La'son Brito were killed in February 2018.
About the author
Barbara Maranzani
Barbara Maranzani is a New York–based writer and producer covering history, politics, pop culture, and more. She is a frequent contributor to The History Channel, Biography, A&E and other publications.
Fact Check
We strive for accuracy and fairness. But if you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us! A&E reviews and updates its content regularly to ensure it is complete and accurate.
Citation Information
- Article Title
- Case File: Oscar Pistorius
- Author
- Barbara Maranzani
- Website Name
- A&E
- Date Accessed
- November 09, 2026
- Publisher
- A&E Television Networks
- Last Updated
- November 09, 2026
- Original Published Date
- November 09, 2026