While outrage over the verdict in the Rodney King case—in which four police officers accused of beating him were found not guilty—is often cited as the flashpoint that triggered the 1992 Los Angeles uprising, it wasn’t the only inciting incident.
On March 16, 1991—barely two weeks after videotape of King’s beating made national news—15-year-old Latasha Harlins stopped into a Los Angeles convenience store to buy orange juice but wound up dead at the hands of the store’s Korean-American owner, Soon Ja Du.
“Latasha had the money for the orange juice in her hand as she got up to the counter,” Brenda Stevenson, Distinguished Professor and Nickoll Family Endowed Chair in UCLA’s history department, tells A&E Crime + Investigation. “It looks as if Mrs. Du has been watching her reflected in mirrors around the shop. She saw that Latasha had put the orange juice in her backpack, so she believed that she was trying to steal it, but she just put it in her backpack to carry it up to the counter. Mrs. Du accused her of stealing it before Latasha could give her the money.”
Harlins said she wasn’t stealing the juice, which cost $1.79, and the two got into a fight captured by the store’s surveillance cameras.
“Latasha got the better of Mrs. Du, who fell down behind the counter, and when she came back up, she had a gun in her hand,” Stevenson, author of The Contested Murder of Latasha Harlins: Justice, Gender and the Origins of the L.A. Riots, explains. “Latasha doesn't say anything else. She turns around and starts to walk out and Mrs. Du shoots her in the back of the head.”
Facing heightened attention following the King case, Stevenson says the police took great care in investigating the killing and interacting with the community.
“They didn't want to have another racially motivated incident that put the police in a bad light for the community, so they did a really good job in investigating,” Stevenson says. “[Du] was charged with first degree murder special circumstances, which was an overreach, but nonetheless, they brought a lot of heat to the case.”
Latasha's cousin Shinese Harlins, who co-founded the Latasha Harlins Foundation and serves as its COO, also sees the connection to King's case. "Both decisions deeply impacted the community and intensified long-standing frustrations and hurt," she tells A&E Crime + Investigation. "These events are forever connected in history, and their effects are still felt today.”
On October 11, 1991, the jury convicted Du of voluntary manslaughter.
“Not only did the jury find her guilty, but the person who interviewed her to figure out what the recommendation would be in terms of sentencing interviewed her twice, and the second time she brought an interpreter just to make sure that Mrs. Du understood what she was asking,” Stevenson says. “They recommended that she get the maximum sentence because she showed no remorse whatsoever.”
The judge, Joyce Karlin, disagreed and gave Du a suspended 10-year sentence (a sentence in which a criminal avoids jail time, but may be subject to sentencing in the future if certain conditions are not met). Du received 400 hours of community service, a $500 fine and five years of probation.
“I think the judge resonated with the immigrant story of the person working very hard and trying to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. An accidental shooting. The girl is killed. And she watches her whole family's dreams be ripped apart because of that,” Stevenson theorizes. “Nonetheless, this is not what the jury had decided, and it certainly was not what people who were watching and were part of the larger Black and Brown communities felt in Los Angeles.”