Catfishing Can Happen to Anyone, Anywhere
One of the higher-profile catfishing cases involved Notre Dame and NFL football star Manti Teʻo, who, in late 2012, told reporters his girlfriend, Stanford University student Lennay Kekua, recently died of leukemia shortly after the linebacker’s grandmother’s unexpected death. Many major media sports outlets reported on the story, but months later, investigative sports reporters discovered Kekua was a fabrication, concocted by “family friend” Naya Tuiasosopo. Teʻo ended up being the butt of late-night host’s punchlines for months.
As detestable as catfishing may be, it is not—and likely will never be—illegal in the United States, thanks to the First Amendment.
“The Constitution protects our lies,” author Meg Leta Jones, who also serves as a Provost's Distinguished Associate Professor in the Communication, Culture and Technology program at Georgetown University, tells A&E Crime + Investigation. “The government is basically prevented from punishing or even chilling most of the lies people tell in our lives, unless there’s some kind of legally actionable harm done.”
Cops can and do pursue perps for crimes like fraud, identity theft and sextortion that frequently go hand in hand with catfishing. Unfortunately, though, most police departments lack sufficient resources to identify and track down catfishing crooks.
“Civil claims are often the only option available to victims, and it isn’t a good option,” Jones says, noting that victims sometimes file lawsuits for defamation or intellectual property violations.
According to the Federal Trade Commission, Americans reported losing $1.14 billion to romance scams in 2024, but experts believe the true amount is far greater. Data indicates 23% of social media users admit to having been catfished at least once. While the majority of catfishing—a staggering 83%—occurs through Facebook, it can even happen on sites like LinkedIn, where catfishing attempts spiked approximately 37% between 2020 and 2023.
The Legal Ramifications of Catfishing
James Grimmelman, a professor of digital and information law at Cornell Tech and Cornell Law School, tells A&E Crime + Investigation that catfishing can’t really be legislated due to the 2013 Supreme Court case United States v. Alvarez.
In 2007, Californian Xavier Alvarez was indicted for allegedly violating the federal Stolen Valor Act, which was first enacted in 2005. Alvarez falsely claimed at a public meeting to be a retired Marine and a recipient of the Congressional Medal of Honor.
“The Supreme Court, in essence, said that you can’t punish lies unless there’s some concrete harm,” Grimmelman explains. “And the courts are very reluctant to punish romantic lies out of a fear—and you can decide if this is reasonable or not—that it would lead to lots of lawsuits and prosecutions from relationships gone bad.”
A jilted lover, for instance, could claim an ex lied about their finances—and then argue in court they never would’ve dated that person had they known the truth.
“Are you going to send that person to jail?” Grimmelman asks. “Allowing these extreme versions of catfishing, where the lies are much more blatant, it just seems to judges like it’s a natural consequence. And if you’re punishing these lies, where would it stop?”
Spotting a Catfish
Grimmelman and Jones say scammers usually reveal themselves to their victims—by not revealing themselves.
“The thing about catfishing is, it’s the obvious,” Grimmelman says. “If you never see the person, or they have an unwillingness to have phone conversations or video chats, that’s a huge red flag.”
Jones notes another major warning sign: “If they ask for cash, you should take some extra steps and determine if the person really is who they said they are.”